Forenregeln » lato. Aristotle, says that legitimacy, reason a

Aristotle calls himself the "friend of truth." He founded the philosophical logic and method Mattia De Sciglio Jersey , constructed from which several thoughts. The logic is rational and deductive demonstration of two or more premises, with the aim of reaching a conclusion. We also know that Aristotelian logic and the principle of excluded middle: if X and Z = Z = T, so that X = T.75

He promoted a revolution since the advent of Socratic thought, especially since the apodictic reasoning or analytic philosophy (also used the nomenclature), to be completed through a local mental functioning indisputable intuition, infected also support the influence the above arguments is defined as the Platonic and Socratic dialectic maieutics. Thus, Aristotle, now on a new basis, the philosophy jumped. The argument became more direct and therefore more objective Matteo Gabbia Jersey , for probable scenarios that do not produce a host of further questions (as the above methods) to ensure the safety of the logical conclusion. Clearly, however, that the success of Aristotelian logic is much more visible in the exact sciences, especially in math (which portrays eternal truths and unchanging). Become feasible in natural science itself, the endless and lengthy speeches that fought a tough battle to prevail as "acceptable", and finally, what was the tantrum seems designed to achieve persuasion over all (kind of reasonable, but more vague concept, with content conditioned by history Matias Fernandez Jersey , by tradition, culture of a community). The logic was presented at that time as a break with previous philosophers. He became the pure logic, no longer depending on the strong emotional appeal (the tantrum), often in the heat of debate, dialectics and maieutics present. The new thinking of Aristotle, in the words of Umberto Eco, marks the beginning of the indisputable logic of deduction, instead of the rhetoric that is proposed, therefore Mateo Musacchio Jersey , as a technique designed to drag the listener.

Despite the criticism, saying that the art of persuasion has not changed at all, would only logical that with the increase of technical innovation of the deduction, to be named as subtle fraud. Aristotle was the first philosopher to deduct their political assumptions, the logic base search centered on justice, bringing the essence complete systemic concepts, for example, in a speech calling for justice. In politics, influenced by logical reasoning Mario Pasalic Jersey , characteristic of his speech, ethics, and might only be a logical formula for Justice and portrayed by Kelsen, to translate into more universal language:

(...) If a right is conferred to an individual a, b, a right to B, the requirement of distributive justice is satisfied if the relationship between the value of A and the value b is equal to the proportion of the value of a value B. If persons A and B are equal, the rights to be given to each is the same as well.

This formula is based on the metaphysics of natural law is called by Aristotle, distributive justice. She wanted to explain why some people deserve more than another principle which requires the allocation of merit. This test is defined as impartial Marco Storari Jersey , sustained by the logic of the derivation of the principle of equality, directly involves the decisions of the government of the city-state. It's content, so it is uncertain and is related to defense or rejection of democracy. Furthermore, the law does not pursue this course and justice in their speeches referred to the other conditions for the existence of Justice. The content of the law is important to have a logical way to work, unlike the works of Plato. Aristotle, says that legitimacy, reason and equity, are in a different plane of material law. That is, the citizen is one who is simply following the law Manuel Locatelli Jersey , the maximum the law of the State, as Kelsen: For Aristotle, the legitimacy, of course, including compliance with the law. Clearly there was an attempt to give fair treatment to the concept of Justice. However, it ignores the fundamental values of the law, left his axiological replace logic of justice, because only in the guidelines of the principle of equality. Moreover, he questioned the Justice for not believing in the certainty of laws Lucas Ocampos Jersey , when the values of the community away, but ca